Re: Implementing Firewall Rules While ITM Components Are Running
John Alvord <jalvord-r/[email protected]> Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:06:52 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.tivoli.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFBECAE69E.D8F9242B-ON88257C1E.0016473A-88257C1E.00169A24__35404.8455869362$1383970645$gmane$org@us.ibm.com> |
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============0802246912== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00169A2488257C1E_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 00169A2488257C1E_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" I am not surprised... but I would have to know more about the setup... whether ephemeral:y was involved... or partition files or KDE_Gateway. The hub TEMS knows a lot of things when there are firewalls involved. When the rug gets shaken, a lot of things it knows about start breaking and a recycle is needed to cause remote TEMSes and WPAs to re-register and thus rebuild the location broker data. Regards, ______________________________________________ John Alvord Advisory Engineer and ITM Historian IBM Tivoli Monitoring 6 Platform Customer Support Office: 1-720-396-2788 Mobile: none jalvord-r/[email protected] Cloud & Smarter Infrastructure IBM Support Portal Open a New Service Request Update your PMR via Email Escalate your PMR My Blog: Wonderful World of Situations Secure upload to ECUREP From: Gregory Mendes <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Date: 11/08/2013 08:41 AM Subject: [TME10] Implementing Firewall Rules While ITM Components Are Running Sent by: [email protected] Hello All, I have a strange anomaly occurring when firewall rules are implemented and ITM components in different zones go "off-line". I thought the "heart beat" mechanisms would allow the rTEMS to reconnect after some sort of downtime. The firewall implementation was immediate. The firewall change to place yesterday evening and when I began to test this morning, my rTEMS in one zone was showing "off-line" until I restarted the rTEMS again. Any idea of what occurred and why they didn't check back in "on-line?" Regards, Gregory R. Mendes 770-317-8593 _______________________________________________ TME10 mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe:[email protected] --=_alternative 00169A2488257C1E_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <font size=2 face="sans-serif">I am not surprised... but I would have to know more about the setup... whether ephemeral:y was involved... or partition files or KDE_Gateway. The hub TEMS knows a lot of things when there are firewalls involved. When the rug gets shaken, a lot of things it knows about start breaking and a recycle is needed to cause remote TEMSes and WPAs to re-register and thus rebuild the location broker data.<br> </font><font size=3><br> Regards, <br> ______________________________________________</font> <table width=433 style="border-collapse:collapse;"> <tr height=8> <td width=433 style="border-style:solid;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px;"><font size=1><br> </font> <table width=433 style="border-collapse:collapse;"> <tr height=8> <td width=221 style="border-style:solid;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px;"><font size=1 face="Arial"><b>John Alvord</b><br> Advisory Engineer and ITM Historian<br> IBM Tivoli Monitoring 6 Platform<b><br> Customer Support </b><br> Office: 1-720-396-2788 <br> Mobile: none </font><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href=mailto:jalvord-r/[email protected]><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>jalvord-r/[email protected]</u></font></a><font size=3><br> </font><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><b><u><br> </u></b></font><a href=http://www.ibm.com/software/tivoli/><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><b><u>Cloud & Smarter Infrastructure</u></b></font></a> <td width=212 style="border-style:solid;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px;"><a href=https://www.ibm.com/support/><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>IBM Support Portal</u></font></a><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href=http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Open_service_request/><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>Open a New Service Request</u></font></a><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href="https://www-304.ibm.com/jct05001c/de/support/ecurep/send_email.html#naming"><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>Update your PMR via Email</u></font></a><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href="http://www-304.ibm.com/support/customercare/sas/f/handbook/getsupport.html#9"><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>Escalate your PMR</u></font></a><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href=https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/jalvord><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>My Blog: Wonderful World of Situations</u></font></a><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u><br> </u></font><a href=https://www.ecurep.ibm.com/app/upload><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><u>Secure upload to ECUREP</u></font></a> <p><a href=https://www.facebook.com/IBMTivolisupport></a><a href=https://twitter.com/TivoliSupport></a><a href=https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/servicemanagement/index.html></a></table> <br> <tr height=8> <td width=433 style="border-style:solid;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px;"><a href=http://www.ibm.com/software/tivoli// target=_new></a></table> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Gregory Mendes <[email protected]></font> <br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, </font> <br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">11/08/2013 08:41 AM</font> <br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[TME10] Implementing Firewall Rules While ITM Components Are Running</font> <br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by: </font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[email protected]</font> <br> <hr noshade> <br> <br> <br><font size=3 face="Calibri">Hello All,<br> <br> I have a strange anomaly occurring when firewall rules are implemented and ITM components in different zones go "off-line". I thought the "heart beat" mechanisms would allow the rTEMS to reconnect after some sort of downtime. The firewall implementation was immediate.<br> <br> The firewall change to place yesterday evening and when I began to test this morning, my rTEMS in one zone was showing "off-line" until I restarted the rTEMS again.<br> <br> Any idea of what occurred and why they didn't check back in "on-line?"<br> <br> Regards,<br> <br> Gregory R. Mendes<br> 770-317-8593<br> <br> </font><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br> TME10 mailing list<br> [email protected]<br> Unsubscribe:[email protected]<br> </font></tt> <br> --=_alternative 00169A2488257C1E_=-- --===============0802246912== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ TME10 mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe:[email protected] --===============0802246912==--