Re: documentation

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:59:59PM -0700, Scott Prahl wrote:
> >
> > This sounds like a good idea. To get the ball rolling I've pulled out
> > all the LaTeX commands in commands.c and put them into a two-column
> > table in an appendix.
> 
> I like this.  It should be a section (not appendix ... because the
> index is a section) with subsections to help separate the commands.
> Alphabetize within each subsection.
> 
> I don't know about commenting on each command.  For example, the fonts
> commands are all pretty well supported.  As are the logos and sectioning
> commands. Special characters are handled pretty well except in  
> equations.
> The *mode commands tend to be pretty good.  Most of the uncategorized
> work well.  Many of the preamble commands are just there to improve  
> parsing.

That's fine. We could do it by categories, i.e., 'all the following
commands should work as expected'. I'll try and sort them into a
reasonable order to minimize the need for case by case comments.

Tyler

-- 
Soy is also murder.

http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail160.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/