Re: Any progress in adding styles in various ways?

On Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at 12:09  AM, Johan Henselmans wrote:

> Scott, Wilfried, is there any progress in adding extra style info in  
> latex2rtf? I wondered if you thought it was OK like it is, or if you  
> want to enhance it. I am in need of extra possibilities, like I wrote  
> in previous mails, but if you are not interested in adding these  
> possibilities, fine.

I am interested in helping.  I am severely limited in time at the  
moment.

You wrote,

> Most of these consist of two arguments: a caption part and a text  
> part. I have implemented them in latex (with rtf on the next line) as:
>
> ======================================================================= 
> ===
> \opmerking[caption]{text} 	: remark
>
> {\s20\fi-283\li283\widctlpar\brdrt\brdrs\brdrw15\brsp100  
> \brdrb\brdrs\brdrw15\brsp100 {\*\pn  
> \pnlvlblt\ilvl10\ls2047\pnrnot0\pnf14\pnfs36\pnstart1\pn
> indent283\pnhang{\pntxtb  
> &}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls2047\ilvl10\adjustright\rin0\lin283\itap0  
> \f18\fs18\lang19\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext0 Opmerking;}
>

The current style system will allow you to have a .cfg file with  
Opmerking in it.
So that is not a problem.  Do you want to have a better macro  
substitution mechanism?
Do you have any general mechanism in mind?

Thanks,
Scott



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn