Re: Beginner question: How to build meta post only
Jonathan Fine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALD=Yf9+B3Dncd163Lma+hFDY+CmaaiAKHgzQPX5Ui0rhTDd2g@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi A search for Linux configure brings up a page that explains its use. Here's the URL https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10961439/why-always-configure-make-make-install-as-3-separate-steps Little special knowledge is needed to make this search. This is a good second step, after first admitting one doesn't know. Kind regards Jonathan On Fri, 12 Dec 2025, 11:17 Philip Taylor (RHBNC) via tex-live, < [email protected]> wrote: > I am *completely* out of my comfort zone here, having never used > "configure" or "make" in my life, but I wonder if the lack of a MetaPost > executable is the result of your invoking "configure" but not "make". What > do you think ? > > -- > *Philip Taylor* > > *--------* > On 12/12/2025 09:59, std300 wrote: > > This email originated from outside Royal Holloway. Be cautious using links, attachments and QR codes. > > > Hello all, > > I'd like to build only the standalone MetaPost software (with debug > info), how can I do this? > > I created a work directory and ran > > ../configure --disable-all-pkgs --enable-mp --without-x > > but I cannot find the mpost executable. > > Can you help? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > This email, its contents and any attachments are intended solely for the > addressee and may contain confidential information. In certain > circumstances, it may also be subject to legal privilege. Any unauthorised > use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. If you have received this > email in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete it. > Any views or opinions expressed in personal emails are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of Royal Holloway, University > of London. It is your responsibility to ensure that this email and any > attachments are virus free. > >