Re: Future of MiKTeX
Vladimir Yumashev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.miktex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agree in full. Perhaps, some people need to write Sumer ? Lucky that 2.1 satisfies me for 200% There is a wonderful principle for programmers (in Russian): Все нужное несложно, все сложное ненужно (All necessary things are not complex, all complex things are not necessary) Regarts to everybody Vladimir Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:20:32 +0300 от [email protected]: >> Am Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:19:42 -0400 schrieb Alan G Isaac: >> >>> If I understand, this is really a complaint that LuaTeX is being >>> updated at the speed you would like. >> >> I don't think that it was meant as a complaint, more as an >> indication that not much happens currently apart from normal package >> updates. > >Isn't this great? TeX was designed to typeset math papers/books, and it >does this perfectly (actually, it has been doing this perfectly starting >from the very first version and plain TeX; recent changes make it worse as >they give more freedom to the editors). Anyway, the programers' motto is >"if it works, don't change anything"! Hence, why to change? > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ulrike Fischer >> http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> MiKTeX-Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >_______________________________________________ >MiKTeX-Users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ MiKTeX-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users