Re: Italic open-o in omega
Chris Rowley <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:40:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.omega.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Phil wrote -- > I begin to wonder whether the > font-metric/glyph dichotomy is just our current way > of representing what is, in fact, a continuum. It is: everything is a collection of numbers in the end ... it is just a matter of how many of these are available to the typesetting program. On a slightly different point: InDesign uses some of the techniques developed by Hermann Zapf for URW. The documentation of that project makes it clear that, for many of Zapf's techniques, considerable information about the glyphs available is needed. It seemed natural in the URW and InDesign contexts that one would simply use the font resources that are necessarily directly available to systems (all except Don Knuth's probably) that `immediately produce typeset output': the fonts themselves. BUT: fractals, shmactals! Total abuse of a technical term. chris