Re: latex linked to pdfetex ?
Christian Ebert <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:57:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta |
|---|---|
| Organization | Black Trash Productions <http://www.blacktrash.org/> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Robin Fairbairns on Tue, Dec 14, 2004: >> most of them looks ok, but latex is linked to pdfetex. Is this really >> correct? > > indeed, as advertised. the latex project suggested doing away with > "tex", making everything e-tex based, and the texlive people realised > we can do with nothing but pdfetex. Hmm, for me the only drawback is that I haven't got it to work with LilyPond (music notation); or, to be more precise, I got LilyPond to work by linking latex to tex in texmf.cnf (otherwise I just use pdflatex) but not the so called lilypond-book interface that integrates notation into LaTeX-documents. This might of course mostly be due to my lack of compiling skills and can be worked around by keeping a tetex-2.0.2 around. And I guess it won't be a long term issue anyway because LilyPond is changing rapidly. Nevertheless I'd be quite interested if someone got both teTeX-unstable and LilyPond to work; as this is probably not the right place for details I'd be glad to receive news concerning this via PM. c -- Der tragische /Transport/ ist nämlich eigentlich leer, und der ungebundenste. ~~ Friedrich Hölderlin, Anmerkungen zum Oedipus