Re: Redhat and Tetex

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:24:27AM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> 
> One example: PassiveTeX is broken in several ways, but I don't have
> the expertise to fix it -- and it is seemingly no longer maintained;
> certainly not actively.  There are some well known bugs that are very
> small in scope but prevent documents from being processed, and yet
> there is no-one around to say what's up.

I am around. I know whats up. I just dont have the time
to work on it. But this is NOT a setup issue,
it is macros which don't do 100% of what they should.

Sebastian