Re: Lucida Fonts in teTeX
"George N. White III" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Bedford Institute of Oceanography |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Thomas Esser wrote: > Well, to some extend it is a teTeX issue, because I decided to use > Walter's new support files *even though* it has introduced an incompatible > change. In defense of Walter and Thomas: Users of free software must accept part of the burden of tracking changes and learning how to debug problems. Commercial software often carries some onus to do the extra work to ensure backwards compatibility, which always has a cost of increased complexity and other overhead. For the free software community, the time of people like Thomas and Walter is a scarce resource, so we have to accept that dropping support for non-essential features is desirable if it simplifies the code and saves developer time in the long term. There are a number of documents that deal with installing and configuring fonts for LaTeX. Vaughan might want to review these and suggest changes to make them more helpful for the next person who encounters the problem. -- George N. White III <[email protected]> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia, Canada