Re: finding natbib bst files

Hi,

On 12/05/04 13:42:15, George N. White III wrote:
> You should think of the tetex version supplied with a linux distro  
> more as a tool for developers who need to rebuild docs after tweaking  
> existing packages.  It is the version used to generate the  
> documentation, and will get trashed if you switch to another distro.   
> It is generally not suitable for authors who need current versions of  
> LaTeX and associated macros/tools.

Huh? I always thought Debian sid gave me a nice current enough tetex,  
at least much more current than what I would get from the frequency I  
could package my own build. After all there is /usr/local for stuff  
that's not in tetex. How many authors do have the required knowledge/ 
resources to build something as complex as tetex routinely on their  
own?

Regards,
	Thomas Jahns
-- 
"Computers are good at following instructions,
 but not at reading your mind."
D. E. Knuth, The TeXbook, Addison-Wesley 1984, 1986, 1996, p. 9