Re: a new release ?

Dumas Patrice <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:17:52 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> That sounds better than my idea.  I hadn't considered that most browsers 
> would deal with those cases.  If any don't we could always deal with it 
> later, or just let your strict switch do it.  The switch probably 
> shouldn't be limited to the command line, though.  Perhaps the command 
> line switch could always override it, but this should be specifiable in 

Of course. All the command line switches have corresponding variables
in the .init file. (but the converse isn't true).

> the .init file, I think.  It would be nice to allow "3.2", "3.2 strict", 
> "4.01", "4.01 strict", etc. packages.

For 3.2 this would imply having another init file as the 3.2 html produced
with html32.init isn't valid anyway.

However the requirements for "strict" html are the same for 3.2 and 4.01
concerning inclusion of <a> in <a> and of <pre> in <a>.

Pat