Re: a new release
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:36:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dumas Patrice wrote: |>|* use texi2html/Conf instead of texi2htmlrc ? |> |>This last one too I still prefer since it is more extensible in an |>organized fashion. | | |The file name is Config and no Conf, since it holds the Texi2HTML::Config |namespace. Is it right ? This is fine with me. |If it is, I think a release can be done. I think that doc should catch up first. At least enough so that an upgrading user can port their old configuration files forward. It would be pretty rude to let a user upgrade and break a configuration without at least warning them. If you wouldn't mind noting other major features and bug fixes in the NEWS file as well, I would appreciate it and, I'm sure, so would our users. The usual guideline is, again, at least one summary line for each major bug fix or feature, with more when necessary. The NEWS file doesn't need nearly as much detail as the ChangeLog, of course. Just blurbs summarizing major functionality, e.g. "@ifhtml works!". You can glance through the existing NEWS file for examples, but IMO, the texi2html NEWS file has been too sparse in the past. The CVS NEWS file might hold a better example of what I have in mind. Derek - -- ~ *8^) Email: [email protected] Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/bwjwLD1OTBfyMaQRAochAKCfOltHRJK5PrHyUh57yDLfWS4eswCfZtu4 JWtPbMD4UZ78riidHgNsAF0= =SSVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----