Re: html normaliser ?

Hi,

> I was about to suggest tidy.
> 
> If tidy wants to correct anything, shouldn't it be fixed in texi2html 
> anyhow?

Of course, but in the future... I just tested tidy on html output of
texi2html and there are lots lots of errors and warnings. Making tidy quiet
doesn't change anything. All those issues have to be taken care of
in the future, but in the mean time, testing that changes in code don't
lead to new bugs. Prior of producing valid html ther are other bugs which 
should (in my opinion) be corrected (correct handling of @verb and 
@verbatim, proper nesting of macros extending on many lines, issue
with @unnumbered...).

> The test script could scan the tidy output for messages to make sure 
> that it is not printing warning messages that mean that it might have 
> corrected something and abort if it finds any.

Good idea. I will take care of that.

Pat