Re: role of ctexi2any

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 05:50:08PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:27:19AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:10:25PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > > After some thinking, maybe a possibility would be to recurse in C if
> > > > either XS is enabled, --enable-additional-checks is passed or any SWIG
> > > > interface is built, as SWIG interfaces may work and provide an
> > > > interesting interface even if XS is disabled.
> > > 
> > > How does the following look?
> > 
> > It looks good to me.  The HAVE_ICONV in tta/C/Makefile.am could additionally
> > be removed.
> > 
> 
> I made this change but I will have to trust you that it is not actually
> needed.  On the face of it, in configure.ac it looked like enable_xs
> could be 'yes' and am_func_iconv could be 'no'.  There was the
> 'enable_txi_libraries' variable which depended on am_func_iconv, which
> made its way into Texinfo::ModulePath, so I will trust that it all works
> out and that we won't try and build code that depends on iconv when it is
> not available.

I am doubting now...  I'll double check.

-- 
Pat
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.