Re: Another D feature

Hello,

Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> > Well, I'll check again later, but I did use 'cvs diff' to create the
> > patch. Should have worked then, shouldn't it?
> 
> If you use the CVS-browse function on SourceForge you can see the patch
> was included.  I don't know why "cvs diff" whould not use it.  Perhaps
> it's using another CVS server that lags behind for a week or so.

Well, in fact 'cvs diff' perform a diff between locally (possibly
modified) file and the version that was checkout-ed (or last updated).
So if modification were done on the repository but you didn't update,
then 'cvs diff' will not show those modifications. I'm always bitten by
this behaviour, so now I do 'cvs diff -r HEAD' in order to have a saner
behaviour :)

Just my two cents,
-- 
Sylvain Defresne                              <[email protected]>
1024D/A036DDB1 6AB9 B65F 7C44 819F DD42  62D2 A093 2840 A036 DDB1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkA5FIgACgkQoJMoQKA23bGpmgCgiURc7DKgtf2NwU/GUDRU8oR+
DaMAmwXDHrFAdU1VSDHQwcZPz6xIah+u
=wdVJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----