Re: XML in core
Bruno Vernier <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Nov 2003 22:50:31 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.memaid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 06:36:12PM +0100, David Calinski wrote: > On Friday 07 of November 2003 17:55, David Calinski wrote: > > On Friday 07 of November 2003 16:55, Bruno Vernier wrote: > > > I agree with everything but I have reservations about the ID field. > > > I can't put my finger on it ... but somehow it does not look right. > > > > > > Isn't it a reserved word in XML? > > There is "ID" field reserved in XML (not "id"), but as XML is case-sensitive > (right?) so "id" won't be a problem, will it? I think that is only if "id" is used as an attribute there is probably no restriction for element names called ID So I remove my earlier reluctances; I am now OK with the original proposal especially upon reading your rationale. Bruno ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/