Re: Automatically notifying about SD-JSON lineup changes
John Veness <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tv.xmltv.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/07/2016 01:06, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > Yes, you can mark channels as "not visible"/"invisible" > (I forget the term on the page). That is often the easiest > solution (as with much else, your particular use cases > will vary). It is what I do for (about) 300 channels that > I do not subscribe to in my lineup. MythTV will fill > in the guide data (it is just a little more database space), > and then it will not (by default) use them to display > the guide or schedule recording. And it moves all > the control to one place (MythTV) rather than trying > to coordinate it two places. Rather than "deleting" > channels you are not interested in, or you cannot > really receive, one can mark them as "invisible". I don't do this at the moment, as I just replied to Kevin. I suppose I could, but it feels conceptually "wrong" for so many channels to appear in the GBR-0001207-DEFAULT lineup which shouldn't be there, and feels wrong to use MythTV to fix this when the problem should be fixed at source, in my opinion. Incidentally, GBR-0001207-DEFAULT seems to have a description of "London | DVB-T | Freeview - Central (South)", which sounds OK as I definitely want DVB-T Freeview and Central (South) sounds about right, although the London is a bit odd as I'm nowhere near London. But it definitely says Freeview and Sky 1 etc. are not on Freeview. I realise this is a Schedules Direct issue and not XMLTV. John -- John Veness, MythTV user, UK, DVB-T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape