Re: UK-RT Grabber Prog Titles To Process Change Requests Thread
Nick Morrott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tv.xmltv.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18 October 2010 23:23, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/10/10 10:01, Nigel Jewell wrote: >> >>> Currently in the listings I see: >>> >>> Have I Got News For You (BBC1 and Dave) >>> Have I Got Old News For You (Dave) >>> Have I Got A Bit More News For You (BBC2) >>> >>> Is everyone happy for the following change as proposed by John: >>> >>> Have I Got Old News For You -> Have I Got News For You >>> >>> I think it's sensible to keep the regular and "Bit More" versions >>> separately-titled, in the same manner that QI and QI XL exist on >>> BBC/Dave. Thoughts? >> >> Personally I think that they should stay as they are. Obviously, the >> "Old" indicates that the program isn't current and if it is removed those >> that are only interested in current episodes will end up recording a stack >> of stuff they don't want. It is easier to add the extra recording profile >> for "Have I Got Old News For You" for those that are really interested in >> "Old" episodes. >> >> Regards, > > Unfortunately some old eps are shown as "Have I Got News For You" and > some as "Have I Got Old News For You" with seemingly no logic (episodes > in the same season are shown with either title, so it doesn't seem to be > a cut-off date thing). So your user recording just "Have I Got News For > You" in the hope of getting new eps only, is already getting (some) old eps. > > Anyway, we don't usually rename program titles just because they are > repeats, e.g. "Mock the Old Week", "Old QI", so I don't see why HIGNFY > should be different. I agree with John here, based on the current HIGNFY data. The grabber already retitles other programmes called "New ..." to their normal versions for consistency, and repeats of a programme should have the same title as their first showing if the content is the same. The Radio Times data can and does flag repeats (although not always), and recordings of first showings can easily be limited to the channel they air on (BBC1 for the regular HIGNFY broadcast, Dave for repeats) without requiring special treatment of their title. The grabber has no means of rewriting titles on specific channels, and in this particular case, there is already the problem (as John points out) of the Dave repeats having 2 different titles for the _same_ content. > I agree that "Bit More" should be titled differently, just like "QI XL", > as it is different content, but the other two titles are for exactly the > same content and same on-screen title. Agreed. Will update the fixups to rename "Have I Got Old News for You" to "Have I Got News for You". If users notice other programmes which have similar titling changes (same content, different titles) please post details. Cheers, Nick -- Nick Morrott MythTV Official wiki: http://mythtv.org/wiki/ MythTV users list archive: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users "An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ xmltv-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmltv-users