Re: New page, contents and references

Hello!

Jeff Kingston <[email protected]> writes:

> Ludovic and Stephane,
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:17:18AM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
>> 
>> > But it's still a good workaround. Is there any chance to add this
>> > @RefSectionGap in the next release ?
>> 
>> Probably.  Jeff?
>
> Technically it would be trivial to add this feature, especially
> since Ludovic has already done it ;-).  But I'm not a fan of it,
> for two reasons: (1) I don't believe it's what reports are about,
> e.g. we don't start sections on new pages;

Oh, you may be right.

On the other hand, there’s @ContentsGap, @GlossaryGap, @AppendixGap,
etc. so it’s probably just as useful as these.  Dunno.

> (2) the workaround is so easy, just add @NP at the end of the previous
> section.

Right.  (I had been wrongfully assuming that the page number could get
wrong somehow.)

Thanks,
Ludo’.