Re: New page, contents and references

Le mercredi 12 janvier 2011 à 21:22 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
> Hello!
> 
> Jeff Kingston <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Ludovic and Stephane,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:17:18AM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> >> 
> >> > But it's still a good workaround. Is there any chance to add this
> >> > @RefSectionGap in the next release ?
> >> 
> >> Probably.  Jeff?
> >
> > Technically it would be trivial to add this feature, especially
> > since Ludovic has already done it ;-).  But I'm not a fan of it,
> > for two reasons: (1) I don't believe it's what reports are about,
> > e.g. we don't start sections on new pages;
> 
> Oh, you may be right.
> 
> On the other hand, there’s @ContentsGap, @GlossaryGap, @AppendixGap,
> etc. so it’s probably just as useful as these.  Dunno.

Hello,

I agree with Ludovic, adding this feature would complete the already
existing ones. Even if it's finally not directly useful regarding my
initial question.

> 
> > (2) the workaround is so easy, just add @NP at the end of the previous
> > section.
> 
> Right.  (I had been wrongfully assuming that the page number could get
> wrong somehow.)

Sorry again about that. And thanks again for your help / Et merci encore
pour ton aide ! :-)


Regards,
Stéphane.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>