Re: Independent columns through the whole document
Oliver Bandel <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:40:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.type-setting.lout |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20160416024036.Horde.ai2Kl5ugA-oCAht9eIkqOWA@webmail.in-berlin.de> |
Zitat von Jeff Kingston <[email protected]> (Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:46:56 +1000) >> I want to have the following: a document that contains >> two *independent* columns, where each of those columns >> is going through the whole (multi-paged) document. > >> There reason for this is: >> I want to have one text as the original, layoutet in the first column. >> The second column is to be intended as a "comment-column" (or one >> also could use it as a >> column with the translation of the "original column". > >> How to achieve that? This should be easy in lout?!? > > For the commentary application, see @MarginNote in the User's > Guide, somewhere near where footnotes are documented. [...] I will use this way together with higher values for @OddRightMargin, @EvenLeftMargin and @MarginNoteWidth. I tried around with setting @MarginNoteFont to 1.00f, but the distance between Margin-Note-Lines is smaller than the line-distance between main-text lines. Can this line-distance in MarginNotes be changed too? Maybe there are good typographic reasons, because of better readability, if the Margin-Notes look different to the main text. But just from technical curiosity I would like to know, if the MarginNotes could act like a second column. (Thats what I had in mind first, but then thought, a different appearance of the commenting text might be better for readability.) On the galley-expertise for the other way: well, maybe one day... ... at the moment my main interest is rather to have an easy to use system, with less typing-clutter than needed with some LaTeX stuff. It looks like some complicated formulas can be done easier in lout. (So, my main goal is to save typing-time, compared to LaTeX.) Maybe if my mind changes and I want to go deeper into lout, I could explore the galleys in more depth. Good to know, there are "some" more possibilities left open :-) Ciao, Oliver