Re: doc formats

Andrew Suffield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:48:57PM -0800, Derek Zhou wrote:
> I support the idea of using (a restricted subset of ) latex (or
> lyx). Yes, it is lacking in the department of sematics, however, it
> probably have (barely) enough sematics to express a technical
> document.

Actually that one isn't an issue. You can invent whatever semantics
you want, with few limits - it *is* TeX under there, after all.

-- 
Andrew Suffield
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD1fyElpK98RSteX8RAnsuAKCAumTRfhIZW/1jG3vPmpbY0mtPbwCeNEQX
clsnRTuh09/XuLWs53Q28Vc=
=AW1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.