Re: revision library pruning
Tim Gokcen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In that case someone with good knowledge of tla should take a good look at some of the scripts in tla-tools. tla-prune-revlib, at least in the debian version 2005.0.patch.26-1 that I have, uses a straight-out rm -rf on the revlib folders, something I would guess is a little dangerous if a copy of tla is presently using that revlib for a changes operation. It would be safer to first mv the revlib folder to a dummy name (like ,,deleteme) before performing the rm -rf, no? Andy Tai wrote: > Yes, that would be a great idea in increasing tla's usability. I will > look into this; a contrib directory would be a place to include tla-tools. > > On 1/23/06, * Alfred M. Szmidt* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > How about distributing tla-prune-revlib with tla? And maybe the rest > of tla-tools? -- Tim Gokcen Mpathix - Development
tim.gokcen.vcf
(text/x-vcard, 303 B)
begin:vcard fn:Tim Gokcen n:Gokcen;Tim org:Mpathix Inc.;Development adr:Suite 201;;5090 Explorer Drive;Mississauga;Ontario;L4W 4T9;Canada email;internet:[email protected] tel;work:(905) 238-7638 ext. 224 tel;home:(416) 425-1532 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.mpathix.com version:2.1 end:vcard