Re: Re: baz format archives in tla

Mark Flacy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user
Message-ID <1144292681l.4200l.1l@flacy>
On 2006.04.05 14:30, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Thomas Lord <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Matthieu Moy wrote:
> >> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >>> Besides, my understanding was that the ultimate goal was to
> remove the
> >>> obligation to use a `c--b--v' name space, and that this archive
> format
> >>> change was one step in this direction.  Is this correct?
> >> Yes, it was the plan, and it has been abandoned.
> >
> > You are not in a position to make such assertions.   You are
> talking about
> > other people's intentions, plans, potential plans, etc.
> 
> We are talking about the plans for Bazaar.

"We" are?

That's funny; I thought that I was subscribed to gnu-arch-users, not  
bazaar-users.

> Had you actually read this thread before flaming, you would  
> probably have noticed it.

I thought that we were talking about the direction of gnu-arch not  
bazaar.

I don't give a fuck about bazaar.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.