Question about bug 8206

Hello,

    While I was browsing through tla's bug database, I came across bug 
number 8206. Basically the bug reports says that "tla changes -H" output 
should define what all proper changes identifiers are. For example, and 
I quote:

"
tla changes gives an output like

A path/to/file
D path/to/other/file
M this/file/was/modified

The meaning of the letters (A, D, M in this example) is not documented 
in tla changes -H, but I think it should be."

I was thinking of creating a patch for this, and submitting it, but 
wanted to ask first. Is there a reason to go against such a patch? Are 
there better ways to do this? Has this been discussed before and it has 
been decided is no good, or just no one has had time to write a patch 
(In which case, I will do so)?

Ok, let me know what you guys think, and we will go from there,
--
Pedro Perez