Re: Question about bug 8206

I am not aware of any such prior patches or any objection to such a patch,
but I am not knowledgeable about the time prior to me being the maintainer.
Maybe Tom can provide the definite answer...

On 9/27/06, Pedro Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>     While I was browsing through tla's bug database, I came across bug
> number 8206. Basically the bug reports says that "tla changes -H" output
> should define what all proper changes identifiers are. For example, and
> I quote:
>
> "
> tla changes gives an output like
>
> A path/to/file
> D path/to/other/file
> M this/file/was/modified
>
> The meaning of the letters (A, D, M in this example) is not documented
> in tla changes -H, but I think it should be."
>
> I was thinking of creating a patch for this, and submitting it, but
> wanted to ask first. Is there a reason to go against such a patch? Are
> there better ways to do this? Has this been discussed before and it has
> been decided is no good, or just no one has had time to write a patch
> (In which case, I will do so)?
>
> Ok, let me know what you guys think, and we will go from there,
> --
> Pedro Perez
>