Re: Question about bug 8206

I think such a patch would be an improvement.

-t



Andy Tai wrote:
> I am not aware of any such prior patches or any objection to such a 
> patch, but I am not knowledgeable about the time prior to me being the 
> maintainer.
> Maybe Tom can provide the definite answer...
>
> On 9/27/06, *Pedro Perez* <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>         While I was browsing through tla's bug database, I came across
>     bug
>     number 8206. Basically the bug reports says that "tla changes -H"
>     output
>     should define what all proper changes identifiers are. For
>     example, and
>     I quote:
>
>     "
>     tla changes gives an output like
>
>     A path/to/file
>     D path/to/other/file
>     M this/file/was/modified
>
>     The meaning of the letters (A, D, M in this example) is not documented
>     in tla changes -H, but I think it should be."
>
>     I was thinking of creating a patch for this, and submitting it, but
>     wanted to ask first. Is there a reason to go against such a patch? Are
>     there better ways to do this? Has this been discussed before and
>     it has
>     been decided is no good, or just no one has had time to write a patch
>     (In which case, I will do so)?
>
>     Ok, let me know what you guys think, and we will go from there,
>     --
>     Pedro Perez
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/