RE: "bk pull" is not updating my local repository
"Andy Chittenden" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <89E85E0168AD994693B574C80EDB9C273F90A9@uk-email.terastack.bluearc.com> |
> It's extremely common amongst BK users to do "let's see if I > want this stuff" > pull. > > bk pull > # look look look, nah, this is junk, I'll wait for it > to stabilize > bk unpull not here it's not. If we did that, then files would be touched and a make would cause a mega rebuild to occur. Our development model is such that we never push untested changes (well, tested to some degree of confidence). And we pull other people's changes overnight and rebuild for a fresh start the following day. We hardly ever pull during the day. We've been using this model since before we used BK and it works extremely well. We too would like to be able to pull into a repo where files are changed: <http://db.bitkeeper.com/cgi-bin/bugdb.cgi?id=2001-05-03-001;.page=view> <http://db.bitkeeper.com/cgi-bin/bugdb.cgi?id=2002-12-12-001;.page=view> -- Andy, BlueArc Engineering _______________________________________________ Bitkeeper-users mailing list [email protected] http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.