Re: Re: Graph Display

Ok, think we agree then ? :-)
this one ?

 ---------------------------
| 1.4 - cilginnis           |
| 2004/07/26 Mon 16:05      |
| Finished design wi...     |
 ---------------------------

What about the code exchange than ?
What do you suggest ?
I think the first 20 characters of  comment are enough any other 
suggestions ?
Dimension oriented ?

If you really want all information ... there would be another pretty simple
solution you may discuss ( sometime :-) ) :
I think its the event log of win 2000 who works similar ...
one doubleclick on an item and a new dialog is opened ...
showing really all information ... when you then click
on another item  the dialog show the information on this item
...
(And you can place buttons on this dialog for navigating through the
tree / export the data open the file ... and so on and so on ... )
what about this ?

ohh and yeah thanks for the friendly welcome !!!
I forget to write this the last time :-) !!!

Claus

Jens Miltner wrote:

>Am 27.07.2004 um 15:24 schrieb kaczoroj:
>  
>
>>Jens,
>>    
>>
>>>I think Claus' original idea of putting *some* of the additional
>>>information into the existing graph view (maybe as a user option)
>>>is actually pretty good and does a good deal of what's currently
>>>missing in graph view.
>>>      
>>>
>>The problem with putting in more information into the graph view is
>>that it would take much more space. So you need an option to disable
>>some of it.
>>
>>Another way to get more information is to just get more information in
>>a view that's capable of it - tree or list control.
>>
>>Both ways have it's good and bad sides - I am just throwing an ideas
>>in ;)
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, I agree - I wouldn't want _all_ information in the graph view 
>either. I'm not even sure I want the additional info there all the 
>time, so an option would be the best.
>However, usually, when I'm looking at the graph view, I need more info 
>than what's there, e.g. which was the last version I committed, some 
>specific comment, etc.
>Walking the list and clicking each item, look at the console, etc. is 
>tedious - here the "compressed" info Claus suggested (i.e. user name, 
>date + first few characters of comment) would allow to find relevant 
>revisions at a glance.
>
>I agree that the same would be possible using a tree view, but tree 
>views are much harder to grasp in overview - at least for the timeline 
>information displayed in our graph view.
>
>Ideally, we'd provide
>
>(a) an option to display _some_ info 'inline' in the graph view,
>(b) optional tool-tips that display all the information for the 
>revision under the mouse, and
>(c) an alternative tree-style view, with columns for each piece of 
>information if I need everything
>
></jum>
>  
>



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cvsgui-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/