Re: [viewvc-users] Viewvc 1.1.2 problems

"C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.viewcvs.user
Organization CollabNet, Inc.
Message-ID <4B289814.2090005__13103.0295895927$1260951591$gmane$org@collab.net>
By the way, the known issue with icons not displaying is tracked here:
http://viewvc.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=438

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> D. Tóth Balázs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have FC 10, SVN 1.6.5, Python 2.5, and ViewVC 1.1.2. (Pygments-Python is 
>> installed.)
>> Formerly I used ViewVC 1.0.6. Unfortunately an automatic update exchanged it 
>> to 1.1.2.
>>
>> Now I have configuration problems.
> 
> Sorry to hear that you are having problems here.  I'll try to explain some
> of the changes and issues you are seeing.
> 
>> 1.  The 'address' configuration became much worse - only a pure e-mail address 
>> is allowed.  It's not so important, but the former one was very good.
> 
> 'address' became a pure email address so the configuration would make sense
> to new users, and the change justified by the fact that admins can modify
> the templates (namely, footer.ezt) if they want something custom there.
> 
>> 2.  Syntax coloration is not working, though pygments-python is installed. 
>> Formerly I could use 'highlight' very nicely.  Very bad.
> 
> I knew I would catch some complaints about this change, but ViewVC 1.1.x got
> rid of five (5) different, incompatible, competing, incomplete syntax
> highlighters, and added a single one that doesn't require forking off one or
> two additional system processes per view.  The Pygments library seems to
> work quite well for most folks, so I'm happy to work with you to determine
> what's not working for you.
> 
>> 3.   Icons doesn't show with IE8 at all. Formerly there were no problems with 
>> default settings.  Very bad.
> 
> Hrm.  There definitely was a period of time where the 1.1.x branch wasn't
> displaying icons.  But that was after 1.1.2, and my own 1.1.2 installations
> don't exhibit problems.  I wonder ... is there any chance that the Fedora
> folks packaged something other than stock 1.1.2?
> 


-- 
C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

------------------------------------------------------
http://viewvc.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4255&dsMessageId=2430740

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.