Re: [viewvc-users] Viewvc 1.1.2 problems
"C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.viewcvs.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | CollabNet, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <4B289814.2090005__13103.0295895927$1260951591$gmane$org@collab.net> |
By the way, the known issue with icons not displaying is tracked here: http://viewvc.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=438 C. Michael Pilato wrote: > D. Tóth Balázs wrote: >> Hi, >> I have FC 10, SVN 1.6.5, Python 2.5, and ViewVC 1.1.2. (Pygments-Python is >> installed.) >> Formerly I used ViewVC 1.0.6. Unfortunately an automatic update exchanged it >> to 1.1.2. >> >> Now I have configuration problems. > > Sorry to hear that you are having problems here. I'll try to explain some > of the changes and issues you are seeing. > >> 1. The 'address' configuration became much worse - only a pure e-mail address >> is allowed. It's not so important, but the former one was very good. > > 'address' became a pure email address so the configuration would make sense > to new users, and the change justified by the fact that admins can modify > the templates (namely, footer.ezt) if they want something custom there. > >> 2. Syntax coloration is not working, though pygments-python is installed. >> Formerly I could use 'highlight' very nicely. Very bad. > > I knew I would catch some complaints about this change, but ViewVC 1.1.x got > rid of five (5) different, incompatible, competing, incomplete syntax > highlighters, and added a single one that doesn't require forking off one or > two additional system processes per view. The Pygments library seems to > work quite well for most folks, so I'm happy to work with you to determine > what's not working for you. > >> 3. Icons doesn't show with IE8 at all. Formerly there were no problems with >> default settings. Very bad. > > Hrm. There definitely was a period of time where the 1.1.x branch wasn't > displaying icons. But that was after 1.1.2, and my own 1.1.2 installations > don't exhibit problems. I wonder ... is there any chance that the Fedora > folks packaged something other than stock 1.1.2? > -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand ------------------------------------------------------ http://viewvc.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4255&dsMessageId=2430740 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].