Re: whatsnew -l much slower in darcs 2.12.5

Hi Evan,

thanks for reporting the issue and showing the output of strace, it
seems there is something going on with the cache system. I will try to
look at this soon.

Guillaume

2017-06-25 2:00 GMT-03:00 Evan Laforge <[email protected]>:
> I've been using the darcs 2.10.1 binary available for OS X, but I
> recently tried 2.12.5 and whatsnew -l is much slower.  E.g.:
>
> % time ~src/hs/darcs-2.12.5/dist/build/Darcs/darcs  w -l
> ...
> ~src/hs/darcs-2.12.5/dist/build/Darcs/darcs w -l  2.48s user 0.47s
> system 101% cpu 2.909 total
>
> % time darcs w -l
> ...
> darcs w -l  0.13s user 0.04s system 96% cpu 0.181 total
>
> Restricting to a single file, e.g. 'darcs w -l X' is still very slow.
> Without -l, both old and new are fast.  This is on a medium sized
> repo:
>
> % darcs show repo
>         Format: hashed, darcs-2
>           Root: /Users/elaforge/src/seq/main
>       Pristine: HashedPristine
>          Cache: thisrepo:/Users/elaforge/src/seq/main,
> cache:/Users/elaforge/Library/Caches/darcs, repo:hub.darcs.net:karya
> boringfile Pref: boring
> Default Remote: hub.darcs.net:karya
>    Num Patches: 5692
>
> The slowdown is also visible in the linux version.  On linux, I tried
> running with strace, and it seems to be constantly running
> mkdir("..cache/patches"), stat(".../.cache/patches"), then
> link("_darcs/patches/...", ".cache/patches") -> EEXIST, repeating for
> many different patches.  It doesn't seem to get stuck at any time,
> just be processing lots of patches.  wc on the strace output shows
> 130k lines.  So maybe that's related?
>
> Anyone else see this?
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users