Re: whatsnew -l much slower in darcs 2.12.5

Thanks for the response.  Let me know if you need any help with reproduction.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Guillaume Hoffmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> thanks for reporting the issue and showing the output of strace, it
> seems there is something going on with the cache system. I will try to
> look at this soon.
>
> Guillaume
>
> 2017-06-25 2:00 GMT-03:00 Evan Laforge <[email protected]>:
>> I've been using the darcs 2.10.1 binary available for OS X, but I
>> recently tried 2.12.5 and whatsnew -l is much slower.  E.g.:
>>
>> % time ~src/hs/darcs-2.12.5/dist/build/Darcs/darcs  w -l
>> ...
>> ~src/hs/darcs-2.12.5/dist/build/Darcs/darcs w -l  2.48s user 0.47s
>> system 101% cpu 2.909 total
>>
>> % time darcs w -l
>> ...
>> darcs w -l  0.13s user 0.04s system 96% cpu 0.181 total
>>
>> Restricting to a single file, e.g. 'darcs w -l X' is still very slow.
>> Without -l, both old and new are fast.  This is on a medium sized
>> repo:
>>
>> % darcs show repo
>>         Format: hashed, darcs-2
>>           Root: /Users/elaforge/src/seq/main
>>       Pristine: HashedPristine
>>          Cache: thisrepo:/Users/elaforge/src/seq/main,
>> cache:/Users/elaforge/Library/Caches/darcs, repo:hub.darcs.net:karya
>> boringfile Pref: boring
>> Default Remote: hub.darcs.net:karya
>>    Num Patches: 5692
>>
>> The slowdown is also visible in the linux version.  On linux, I tried
>> running with strace, and it seems to be constantly running
>> mkdir("..cache/patches"), stat(".../.cache/patches"), then
>> link("_darcs/patches/...", ".cache/patches") -> EEXIST, repeating for
>> many different patches.  It doesn't seem to get stuck at any time,
>> just be processing lots of patches.  wc on the strace output shows
>> 130k lines.  So maybe that's related?
>>
>> Anyone else see this?
>> _______________________________________________
>> darcs-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users