Re: C++11

Hendrik Boom <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:04:01PM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> 
> Given the (lack of) manpower,

It may take some effort to introduce all the C++11 features being 
discussed here.  Getting rid of things that don't work in C++11, well, 
that's somethingg we'll have to do anyway.  But factoring or 
refactoring in new C++11 features is probably going to cost us more 
time than it saves.  Unless, of course, there are serious plans to 
introduce major new facilities into monotone where the improved clarity 
of the code will benefit us.

> I think it's actually beneficial to the
> project to reduce the variety of supported platforms.

The way we're talking, it almost seems the C++11 is itself a new 
platform.

-- hendrik
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.