Re: C++11

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 07:29:08PM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hey Hendrik,
> 
> > Of course, the operational questions here are *when* the transition 
> > should occur, and how long dual-operation should be supported when it 
> > does.
> 
> I think the answer to the dual-operation duration is obvious: Zero. We
> just don't have the man-power.
> 
> What do you think would be a good time to switch to C++11?
> 
> I'm a bit concerned that botan is switching to C++11. (And just notice
> that botan even states gcc-4.7 as the minimum requirement for 1.11 onwards.)

It's possible that botan may force our hand, whether we want to stay 
with the old C++ or not. 

-- hendrik