RE: Vault 2.0.3 performance
Brandon Casci <[email protected]> Tue, 25 May 2004 15:57:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.sourcegear-vault.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
SWOOOOSH!! Hella ya, Vault 2.0.3 is faster than ever! -----Original Message----- From: jeff clausius [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [vault-list] Vault 2.0.3 performance A follow up here. There was a mis-communication in the original message. Brandon had upgraded to *Vault 2.0.2*, not Vault 2.0.3. With this version, he happened across the Vault 2.0 through 2.0.2 bug which affects client side performance when a repository contains a large number of shares. He updated a couple of clients to Vault 2.0.3, and well... I'll leave it up to him to remark on his performance improvements. Jeff SourceGear Eric Sink wrote: > This certainly is not the behavior we would expect. > Most users report that performance increases > when upgrading from 1.x to 2.0. > > I suspect the 2002 patch would not be the source > of this kind of a problem. > > -- > Eric Sink > Software Craftsman > http://software.ericsink.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brandon Casci > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [vault-list] Vault 2.0.3 performance > > Hello > > We upgraded to Vault 2.0.3 a few days ago, and it appears to be much slowr > than Vault 1.2.x > > Typical check in operations take 2 to 3 times longer, or anywhere from 10 to > 10 seconds per file. > > For the time being we are using Vault 2.03 with the Visual Studio 2002 > patch. Could this be a perfoemce hit? > > Get the latest news on SurfControl and our products, > subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter, SurfAdvisory at: > http://www.surfcontrol.com/resources/surfadvisory/surfadvisory_signup.aspx > > ********************************************************************* > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken > or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, > please contact the sender. > ********************************************************************* > SurfControl Inc. > 100 Enterprise Way, Suite A110 > Scotts Valley, California 95066 > 831-440-2500 > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list > _______________________________________________ vault-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list Get the latest news on SurfControl and our products, subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter, SurfAdvisory at: http://www.surfcontrol.com/resources/surfadvisory/surfadvisory_signup.aspx ********************************************************************* The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender. ********************************************************************* SurfControl Inc. 100 Enterprise Way, Suite A110 Scotts Valley, California 95066 831-440-2500