Re: Vault 2.0.3 performance
jeff clausius <[email protected]> Mon, 24 May 2004 16:48:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.sourcegear-vault.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A follow up here. There was a mis-communication in the original message. Brandon had upgraded to *Vault 2.0.2*, not Vault 2.0.3. With this version, he happened across the Vault 2.0 through 2.0.2 bug which affects client side performance when a repository contains a large number of shares. He updated a couple of clients to Vault 2.0.3, and well... I'll leave it up to him to remark on his performance improvements. Jeff SourceGear Eric Sink wrote: > This certainly is not the behavior we would expect. > Most users report that performance increases > when upgrading from 1.x to 2.0. > > I suspect the 2002 patch would not be the source > of this kind of a problem. > > -- > Eric Sink > Software Craftsman > http://software.ericsink.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brandon Casci > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [vault-list] Vault 2.0.3 performance > > Hello > > We upgraded to Vault 2.0.3 a few days ago, and it appears to be much slowr > than Vault 1.2.x > > Typical check in operations take 2 to 3 times longer, or anywhere from 10 to > 10 seconds per file. > > For the time being we are using Vault 2.03 with the Visual Studio 2002 > patch. Could this be a perfoemce hit? > > Get the latest news on SurfControl and our products, > subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter, SurfAdvisory at: > http://www.surfcontrol.com/resources/surfadvisory/surfadvisory_signup.aspx > > ********************************************************************* > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken > or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, > please contact the sender. > ********************************************************************* > SurfControl Inc. > 100 Enterprise Way, Suite A110 > Scotts Valley, California 95066 > 831-440-2500 > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list >