Re: Subversion 1.15.0-rc3 up for testing/signing

Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel
Message-ID <CAPZho0_hGRAfZShEaDK=2TLLFwBDj1CWT6DwE2Rw8u-i14MxeA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 16:12, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 13. 7. 2026 13:37, Evgeny Kotkov via dev wrote:
>
> The 1.15.0-rc3 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> I found this difference in the generated targets.cmake between the tar.gz
> and zip archives. There's no semantic difference but I wonder if it's
> relevant, given that the generator is supposed to be the same, the
> conditions shouldn't be reversed like this:
>
> --- subversion-1.15.0-rc3/build/cmake/targets.cmake     2026-07-13 12:31:42
> +++ zip/build/cmake/targets.cmake       2026-07-13 12:31:23
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
>  endif()
>
>  # Test changes in libsvn_fs_base
> -if (SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS AND SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE)
> +if (SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE AND SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS)
>    add_executable(changes-test
>      subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/changes-test.c
>    )
> @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@
>  endif()
>
>  # Tests for *public* fs API (svn_fs.h)
> -if (SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS AND SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE)
> +if (SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE AND SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS)
>    add_executable(fs-base-test
>      subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/fs-base-test.c
>    )
> @@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@
>  endif()
>
>  # Test strings/reps in libsvn_fs_base
> -if (SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS AND SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE)
> +if (SVN_ENABLE_FS_BASE AND SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS)
>    add_executable(strings-reps-test
>      subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/strings-reps-test.c
>    )
> @@ -4091,7 +4091,7 @@
>  endif()
>
>  # Subversion Server
> -if (SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS AND SVN_ENABLE_RA_SVN)
> +if (SVN_ENABLE_RA_SVN AND SVN_ENABLE_PROGRAMS)
>    add_executable(svnserve
>      subversion/svnserve/cyrus_auth.c
>      subversion/svnserve/log-escape.c
>
>
>
I can confirm this issue, though it doesn't affect the build itself. It
should be fixed in r1936132.

Longer term, we could think about getting to a state where our .tar.gz,
.tar.bz2, and .zip all have identical content (generated once). Otherwise
we risk potential inconsistencies: for example, if someone on Windows
downloads subversion-1.14.5.tar.bz2 instead of .zip. And it also makes the
release process more complicated, because there is at least 2x different
content to check/verify.

>
-- 
Ivan Zhakov
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.