Re: Subversion 1.15.0-rc3 up for testing/signing

Timofei Zhakov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel
Message-ID <CAPD1kXTUNHrEO0ib2HJX_K1xTPjWss524c=kxMO2-4t5gLLjKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 12:38 PM Evgeny Kotkov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Timofei Zhakov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > How exactly are we planning to roll the final release? I mean in a sense
> > AFAIK according to the policy we need two official RC's to be released
> > before. Am I missing something?
>
> The core concept for .0 release is the "soak" period.  Once the first
> public
> RC is out, we start a four-week soak.
>
> The process is described here, with a really helpful diagram:
>
> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization-overview
> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/svn-soak-management.png
>
> If there are no blockers requiring destabilizing fixes, the whole process
> can be as simple as "ship one RC, wait four weeks, then ship a final build
> identical to that RC", deferring everything else to a .1 patch release.
>
> In other words, we don't necessarily need an RC4 build if no critical
> problems are found in RC3.
>
> We may, however, want to roll a newer release candidate with some of the
> non-destabilizing fixes merged, if we think it makes sense for them to be
> in 1.15.0 rather than 1.15.1.  In that case we would publish RC4, RC5, and
> so on.  Once the soak ends, the latest RC becomes the final 1.15.0 build.


Thanks for explaining!

I don't know where I get that from, I guess because we indeed need one but
the amount of RC's we already had confused me.

-- 
Timofei Zhakov
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.