Re: Adding CMake to 1.15.x release notes
Branko Čibej <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Apache Software Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22. 7. 2026 16:25, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 3:18 PM Ivan Zhakov<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 16 May 2026 at 20:19, Nathan Hartman<[email protected]> wrote: >>> r1934265 (improving the CMake text in INSTALL) reminded me that CMake >>> is not yet mentioned in the 1.15.x Release Notes. >>> >>> I'd like to add it there--after all, it is a new major (and long- >>> requested!) feature in 1.15.x! >> +1! >> >>> But I've lost track of where it is >>> currently. Has it reached parity with the autotools build, e.g., being >>> able to build all the bindings? Any current limitations I should >>> document? >>> >> A week ago I created document to summarize features supported by different Subversion build systems. >> >> Google Sheet document: >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1goa9mrX75RhqQLSsNAr9z6G6cqDvUMDe5xWDJYG99cg/edit?gid=0#gid=0 > > Is this spreadsheet considered the source of truth for the status of > the CMake build? If so, can/should I link to it from the Release > Notes? Alternatively, we could move this to the CWIKI, or turn it into > a HTML table and put it in the release notes directly, or... any other > ideas?? Using cwiki and linking from there would be fine, it's a live document after all. Maybe add columns for "supported in version..." since at least the CMake build will be catching up for a while. >> PDF is also attached. >> >> I didn't all features: in many cases I just have checked relevant source code. >> >> Any comments and fixes will be much appreciated. On the testing side, our test suit also supports https:// and svn+ssh:// and various combinations of server version and WC version, those lines should probably be added. Though there's no automated support for the less frequently used features. -- Brane