Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Nov 6, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Greg Stein wrote:

> [Sorry for brevity; phone]
>
> We're not ready for an alpha, but we could do an "internal"  
> experimental
> release. I seem to recall seeing that in the docs.

+1

As I thought I said earlier, *any* release that has proper Apache  
packaging, licensing, and notices is fine with me. We've had this  
discussion in the incubator before, for similar reasons, and I think  
there is consensus that a formal review of a podling release is a  
reasonable gate for graduation. No one needs to believe that the  
release is stable, tested, reliable, etc.; it just needs to be reviewed.

Craig
>
> How about that?
>
> On Nov 6, 2009 3:50 PM, "Craig L Russell" <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009  
> at
> 14:36, Craig L Russell <Cr...
> For my money, I'd prefer to see a real Apache release with the real
> copyright notices and licenses that the project intends to ship.
>
> Perhaps make an alpha 1.7 from the trunk? Doesn't even need to work
> perfectly, since the process to make sure a release works is already  
> known.
>
> We have required every incubating project for the last few years to  
> make a
> release before graduation.
>
> Craig
>
>>>>>> Does that clarify my message? > > Thanks, > -g >
>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge...
>>
> Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
> http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:...

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!