Re: RapidSVN poll: Vicual C++ 6.0 projects still needed?

Basically I accept! I'm using VC2005 and VC2008 now.
# I want to use MinGW rather than VC6 if I can.

However, I remember an incompatibility about direct BDB repository
access. Different compiler makes an incompatible binary which has
different BDB repository format, maybe.
http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=595

Subversion's official source code has only VC6 project yet. Windows
developers may be let to use a pre-compiled library from official
release instead of themselves compiling by VC2005...

Me? I'm already using pre-compiled lib files in official releases. I
have no problem.


2009/11/2 Alexander Mueller <[email protected]>:
> The build system based on Visual C++ 2005 Express works pretty stable so
> far. Is there any need for VC6 projects? Remember: whenever a project
> setting is changed all build environments have to be adapted.
>
> So, please vote for the next 2 weeks, until Nov 15th.
>
> Respond to this mail and append IN or OUT to the subject.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=668&dsMessageId=2413795
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
>



-- 
Hisateru Tanaka

------------------------------------------------------
http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=668&dsMessageId=2417175

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].