Re: RapidSVN poll: Vicual C++ 6.0 projects still needed?
Alexander Mueller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.rapidsvn.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well our official releases dont come with self-compiled SVN libs but with the binary ones so this should not be a problem... Hisateru Tanaka schrieb: > Basically I accept! I'm using VC2005 and VC2008 now. > # I want to use MinGW rather than VC6 if I can. > > However, I remember an incompatibility about direct BDB repository > access. Different compiler makes an incompatible binary which has > different BDB repository format, maybe. > http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=595 > > Subversion's official source code has only VC6 project yet. Windows > developers may be let to use a pre-compiled library from official > release instead of themselves compiling by VC2005... > > Me? I'm already using pre-compiled lib files in official releases. I > have no problem. > > > 2009/11/2 Alexander Mueller <[email protected]>: >> The build system based on Visual C++ 2005 Express works pretty stable so >> far. Is there any need for VC6 projects? Remember: whenever a project >> setting is changed all build environments have to be adapted. >> >> So, please vote for the next 2 weeks, until Nov 15th. >> >> Respond to this mail and append IN or OUT to the subject. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=668&dsMessageId=2413795 >> >> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://rapidsvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=668&dsMessageId=2417234 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].