Re: Blender 2.93 Released!

Dan McGrath via Bf-committers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.blender.devel
Message-ID <CAK82gMGO_39K-eauBKxojyC__w7dq=JgHSYT7rVfqZ6GpPLkWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

For an official online repository that is integrated into Blender, users
> would not notice much difference compared to bundled add-ons. I think it
> would be valuable to have a way for more developers to share their add-ons
> in the same way.
>

Out of curiosity, where and how were you thinking of hosting this
repository? I would suggest our Google workspace area, due to the ACL,
accountability and immutability of their system, but I don't know that the
team would prefer that over S3 or self hosting.

If self hosted, what about the security of this? A compromise of a binary
is trickier; the binary rarely changes, has well known checksums, is signed
(on Win/Mac) and at least goes through mirrors and Microsoft which surely
have excellent monitoring for unusual behaviour and known malware. If you
start self-hosting auto-updating python code, files are directly uploaded
into users' networks and devices. You bypass a lot of that built in
security in our delivery pipeline in a way I don't know you can easily
compensate for, not to mention all of the bandwidth costs which are already
a challenge to our gigabit link.

--
Cheers,
Danny

----------------------------------------------------------
Danny McGrath - [email protected]
GPG key: EDF6 AFF5 2086 F93A 1F59 36A5 44B6 26F3 6968 71CA
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
List details, subscription details or unsubscribe:
https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.