Re: Debian and CinePaint

Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:42:14 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi fellow CinePaint-engaged developers,

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 07:17:21AM -0800, Robin Rowe wrote:

> Thank you for the Debian packaging tools description. Ok that I post 
> that to the blog?

Sure thing. Questions like that is actually my reason for last line of 
my standard email footer.

(Ideas to how I might generally improve getting the message across that 
I welcome reuse of material, texts etc. I produce is much appreciated!)


>> I'd rather ask the opposite, if you don't mind:
>>
>> What are your opinions on packaging style and helper tools to use?
>>
>> If Lars and 1-2 others can't/won't work with CDBS or Git, then it 
>> might make better sense for Cinepaint to bet on them repackaging in a 
>> more "classic style" that has a lower entry for others too.
>
> It's great you're inviting discussion. However, consensus is 
> unnecessary. It's not majority rules here. CinePaint is a republic, 
> not a democracy.

You can have multiple build systems concurrently, and multiple Debian 
packages. But only one official Debian package, using one specific chain 
of build routines.

I was not intending to throw a vote, but find the packaging style that 
fits the most engaged Debian-oriented developers. So more of a 
technocracy than a democracy.

Not that I care much. Give me the input I need (official upstream 
tarball and comments on your testing my packaging routines and how they 
fail), and acknowledge my work (by not appointing others to do identical 
work in parallel), and I will be devoted to work with you on this :-)


>> Upstream release cycle need not match those of downstream distros.
>
> I recently participated in Ubuntu FOSScamp, the upstream pow-wow tied 
> to UDS and the next release of Ubuntu. It would be helpful to me to be 
> in sync, to be able to frame discussion to a common timeline.

Ok ok, correction: _I_ need no particular upstream release schedule.

If you want to to partner with Ubuntu, Redhat, whoever and match their 
needs, I won't mind. :-)


>> I do not blog. Could you perhaps duplicate such posts to the 
>> mailinglist?
>
> Yes, I'm writing Perl code to automate replicating posting to the list 
> when I post to the blog and to update the website.

Sounds excellent.

Had a look at some of your blogs just now.

Happy birthday! :-D


  - Jonas

P.S.

Please do not cc me when posting to this list: I am subscribed. Thanks 
anyway.

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklOf/YACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjwDwCeMKrz0EQFBqP3rvWoetKqnraJ
LFEAni5Yga2wujmECTcBzIjYfu8rzkJv
=sAQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------