Re: [CinePaint] Really basic script for batch converting
Frank Peters <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:22:40 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:54:03 -0000 (GMT) [email protected] wrote: > > I've been trying out adding a minute amount of noise to an 16/32bit image > converted from 8bit in Cinepaint as per early Photoshop 15bit + 1bit noise > comments in last email and so far I'm happy with outcome. > > I've taken an 8bit image in Cinepaint, convert to 16 or 32bit, add a layer > by duplicating the background, use 'noisify' to add .008 noise to each of > the 3 channels. > > Checking the histogram to see if it is all smooth. > Did it appear gapless? You must realize that the histogram tool in cinepaint, or in other image processing software, does have the resolution to always show the gaps. But the gaps from conversion are there. Here is an illustration: I created a grayscale image, with 8-bit depth, containing a linear ramp of values from 0 to 255. From this image a data file was created containing very acrurate histogram values. This data was plotted using gnuplot. It is shown in this link: http://home.comcast.net/~frank.peters/ramp255.png Notice that the distribution is perfectly uniform across all values, as expected. The histogram tool in Cinepaint would show an identical distribution for this image. Now, this 8-bit image file was then converted into 16-bit. The data for a histogram was very accurately obtained and plotted in gnuplot. The result is shown here: http://home.comcast.net/~frank.peters/ramp255to65535.png Notice the presence of many gaps all across the range. (The plot consists of many steps going repeatedly from 0 - 1000.) Cinepaint however would not reveal these gaps. In Cinepaint, the distribution would appear identical to the previous image. 65536 steps is an enormous range and it is not practical to create a histogram tool that will always reveal the fine detail. However, specialized software can show the detail. Even this quick illustration does not do full justice to the changes. In fact, if the horizontal axis on the second image were to be expanded, the gaps would be seen to be even greater, while the first image would still be perfectly uniform. But I did not want to spend a lot of time on this. Frank Peters ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july