Re: [CinePaint] controversial question (could be my fault).
Rob Lingelbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.cinepaint.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 14, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > > I downloaded and processed nef with cinepaint. your browser must support MIME-types of NEF? or ... > There is a lot of noise > but that is normal. The settings are ISO 1600. With such a high ISO > there is nothing abnormal about the image. oh man. fuggedaboudit. I shot it without flash, indoors, didn't realize the camera would jump the ISO so high but that's what they're supposed to do on Auto mode, assuming 1/30 sec. > There are a 2 megabyte jpeg showing > the cinepaint result and a 22 kilobyte preview image that was > extracted > from the nef. I could email those directly to you if your email > server has no qualms about large attachments. Let me know. > > The noise problem can be dealt with in many ways via post-processing. > One effective way is to use greycstoration: > > http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/ that's good to know about, thanks. I'll look into that tool. > So there is nothing wrong with cinepaint. The image appears > as it should appear. I didn't really think there was anything wrong with cinepaint, in fact I thought it was giving me everything in the image, but wanted to know what to do to deal with the noise without giving up sharpness (always a bit of a tradeoff). thanks very much Frank, if you'd like to send me the results via email feel free, can handle big files. -- Rob Lingelbach [email protected] http://www.colorist.org/robhome.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/