Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Add CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA_CORE
Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:19:11 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.pci,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-04 09:42, Matt Evans wrote: > > Just shoving an #ifdef in mlx5 isn't right, so would be grateful for > your advice on the most tasteful resolution: > > 1. Imagining future drivers might use pcim_p2pdma_provider(), maybe > p2pdma could export a `pcim_p2pdma_supported()` or similar which > returns whether CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA is present and P2P can ever work. > A user of pcim_p2pdma_provider() is required to also check if P2P is > overall supported. > > Ugliness aside, a driver could use #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA to test > whether P2P is expected to work, except that doesn't stop modules > falling into the same trap. I think a function export is better. > > 2. And/or a test (such the function from #1, or an #ifdef) in the IB > core DMABUF path, to avoid individual drivers from doing the test in > their .mmap_get_pfns(). Other future drivers would be expected to > do similar. > > Any better ideas? Sorry I didn't catch this earlier in the review > cycles, I know we've looked at this patch a few times now. I see the problem now. Yes, it's a bit tricky and I don't have a great answer. But the proposed solution seems very confusing. I definitely don't think we should be adding ifdefs in the IB core for this. For me, this is mainly a naming problem as there's a bunch of ways to address it in the code. The question is what do we call p2pdma vs. core p2pdma in a way that makes the distinction more obvious. There's a vague convention for this already: the term 'p2pmem' is often used for cases where the driver uses the allocator, etc. (I think I had this intention when I wrote the code and have since forgotten about it). I'm thinking we should lean into that more and instead of introducing CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA_CORE we introduce CONFIG_PCI_P2PMEM and move all that code into it's own file, potentially renaming some functions. Then, in the end, we would probably have a pcim_p2pdma_supported() function and a pcim_p2pmem_supported() function, the latter being used by existing use cases. Logan