Re: [Fresco-devel] small patch for iso c++ header

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:35:32AM -0500, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Nick Lewycky wrote:
> 
> >Indeed. When *do* we plan to drop support for gcc2.95? Post M2? Post M3?
> 
> I return the question: who (at least here on the list) is building fresco
> with gcc 2.9x ? And, would requiring gcc >= 3.2 be an obstacle for you ?
> 
> If it turns out not to be an issue, we can drop gcc 2.9x support right away.

I'm still using 2.9x, but that's just because I've been too lazy to
upgrade my system omniORB install.  Switching won't be a big deal,
especially if the omniorb debs are dependable these days.

-- Nathaniel

-- 
"But in Middle-earth, the distinct accusative case disappeared from
the speech of the Noldor (such things happen when you are busy
fighting Orcs, Balrogs, and Dragons)."

This email may be read aloud.