Re: [Fresco-devel] small patch for iso c++ header

Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:35:32AM -0500, Stefan Seefeld wrote:

> > I return the question: who (at least here on the list) is building fresco
> > with gcc 2.9x ? And, would requiring gcc >= 3.2 be an obstacle for you ?
> >
> > If it turns out not to be an issue, we can drop gcc 2.9x support right away.
> 
> I'm still using 2.9x, but that's just because I've been too lazy to
> upgrade my system omniORB install.  Switching won't be a big deal,
> especially if the omniorb debs are dependable these days.

Well I use 2.9x atm, with omni3. I've got gcc3.2 installed from debs,
but not omni4 yet - are the omni4 debs in unstable in the gcc3-abi
format?

Much as I'm normally for an upgrade to a better system, how much would
such a change affect *potential* testing by new people? "Oh sorry, you
can't use gcc2.95 to compile fresco, upgrade your compiler (and all your
C++ libs) before coming back to us!" ;)

-- 
Neil