Re: Visual Studio .NET 2003 port

Add on:

As for what was written regarding QT 3.2 : this issue is completely 
unrelated to not only the existing Win32 console build and workspaces 
but also to the actual "port". The choice of using QT 2.3 is still up to 
the user, it's just not been tested to use 2.3 with VS.NET.

For the choice of 2.3 and 3.2 in the future I see the following facts 
(and this is actually regarding 0.5 and is fairly unrelated to 0.4):
- it's not even supported by trolltech anymore
- it generally is not very rich on features
- it's tedious to keep 2.3/current linux version in synch, since a lot 
of stuff changes over the time and you have to implement a lot of small 
annoying functions for the windows side that are actually already 
existing in the current QT-API. (etc pp)

Since we figured out the lincensing issues and came to the conclusion 
that it is perfectly fine to redistribute the runtime files from the 
book-cd, QT 3.2 seems like the perfect choice for the future.

-coma